While certainly some of these chord progressions were revolutionary and are still key in reproducing some of today's most classic genres, we'd still like certain genres of music to move forward.... I have a feeling that although new chord progressions might sound weird at first, with enough use we'd easily attach an emotion or mood to them, just as we did to the blues and to the 50's bebop progression--I bet if the 4 chord blues were played in the 17th century, everyone'd think it was odd and dissonant crap.Here are the two chord progressions that I think have become most worn-out in the popular music of the last few years (the first of which is in chrisjh's list):
Progression #1
I - V - vi - IV. If you're in the key of C, this is C - G - A minor - F.
A prototypical example is U2's "With or Without You":
Someone asked about this progression in this AskMetafilter thread, which contains some detailed analyses (including mine). That thread links to this YouTube clip that brilliantly reveals the monotony of so much popular music:
The progression certainly has its place. In "With or Without You" and "Let It Be," it's beautiful. I also like it in the songs by Michael Jackson, the Red Hot Chili Peppers, and Bush in that clip -- all from at least 15 years ago. But recently, this chord progression and the next one have so thoroughly infected pop music that I can't take today's top 40 seriously.
Progression #2
i - VI - III - VI. In the key of A minor, this is A minor - F - C - G.
Here's a whole article about it, which calls it the "Sensitive Female Chord Progression" and suggests that you can identify it by trying to sing Joan Osborne's "One of Us" over it:
Progressions #1 and #2 are very closely related. You can derive either one from the other by starting halfway into one of them (i.e. starting with the 3rd of the 4 chords) and looping back to the begin.
Between these two chord progressions, you can easily write a whole radio station's worth of hits -- as long as you don't mind if music stays in the same place rather than evolving. Even when an artist as respectable as Regina Spektor uses these progressions (#1 in "On the Radio," #2 in her new "Blue Lips"), the result is wearying.
No comments:
Post a Comment